Today we are looking at the Literature gallery, with our Top Tips.
Sweet Tea in the SouthIn the summer I'll hear them chatter and babble and chuckle and cluck like two frivolous chickens in pink polka dot dresses. I'll be peering down aisle nine and see neat rows of tea and crunchy, sugary biscuits they can shove into their mouths, indulge in their spoken virtues as little crumbs sprinkle onto their laps. They're heaving tomatoes drenching under summer sun, the crows feet under their baby blue eyes lapping up experience in the years they've lived down here, where sweet tea is a delicacy swimming around fat ice cubes. They'll haul their modern wagonwheel through the maze of eye twinkling treats, chirping for their tomato faced young while waddling away.
I'll see them breezing past me in a feeding frenzy, two, three, four little chicks hustling over to their rather plump parents. They'll lug their crusted heels down the path, pecking for some chocolate chip cookies or those spicy pork skins with really mind boggling logo designs.
Before you start
READ the piece all the way through.
Read it again, making notes of what you would like to point out in your critique.
Stay Objective- you are critiquing the piece not the person.
These tips are areas which aren't just necessary in critiquing others' work, but also when self-critiquing your own writing. This is one person's suggestions and I welcome any further tips in addition.
A good opening. The opening to any form of writing doesn't necessarily need to involve a physical explosion, but it needs to have an initial hook; something to entice the reader in. It needs to be clear, something that sparks interest and leads the rest of the piece. Keep an eye out for opening paragraphs/stanzas that are flat and uninteresting. How can the writer improve their opening lines?
Show don't tell. I would put my money on those who critique having used this phrase in their before. Showing, not telling refers to understanding your audience and engaging them in your writing. A lot of newer writers often have a great idea for a story and splurge the whole story out as they are making it up as they are going along (like they are telling themselves the story). This sometimes means the audience element is forgotten. Show, don't tell encourages the writer to allow the reader to experience the story for themselves, through the characters perspective and not through the narrator talking at the audience, overbearing with description, blocking the imagination of the reader. The reader wants to be able to be in the story and feel the story for themselves.
Cutting the fat.- This is a two part phrase- the first which focuses on sentence structure, the second on over description. Often we can get over descriptive or use too many words to make the same point. Although this is a very good skill for a writer to learn in self critique, it is also a very good aspect to review in giving critique to others too. Look out for the "sapphire icy sea-blue eyes that reflected in the sky" when all we care about is the colour is blue. Adjective abuse is a common habit, even for some of the more frequent writers and pointing out these can really help improve a piece.
Sentence structure bottles down to readability- do we have ridiculously long sentences that lack punctuation breaks? Are there random short sentences that have no meaning or significance to the rest of the plot? Look for repetitive sentences and words also.
Clichés. We've all read the poems with imagery such as "broken wings", "crimson tears" etc, but clichés have a nasty habit of slipping in everywhere. Writers can sometimes use them without even realising it- how many characters have "beads of sweat running down their back" or how many battles are called "epic clashes of steel"? Writing is about originality and although sometimes a little cliché is healthy, it really should only be a little. Helping a writer notice where their clichés lie can encourage more original writing.
SPAG. SPAG stands for "Spelling, Punctuation and Grammar". This is a fundamental element of good writing. Poor SPAG will usually put the reader off from even glancing at the work and this is essential especially those aiming for future publication. Sometimes people do make small typos and mistakes, so pointing them out actually helps the writer considerably!
Fluidity. How does the piece flow? Is the piece difficult to read? If certain pieces aren't working, try reading them aloud to see what is tripping the piece up. Does the order of stanzas/paragraphs make sense? Could sections be removed or rearranged to improve it?
Presentation. Ridiculous small writing can be offputting to read. Often people include things in their writing to "make it unique", but actually sometimes this unique element actually makes the piece unreadable and unappealing to the audience. It is harder for most people to read from a computer monitor than a book and therefore writing needs to clean and clear. How does the writer's piece look visually?
Style over substance. There are many different forms of literature, different styles and some forms which have specific rules. However some writers often find themselves caught into the style of the poem and forgetting about the content. Also, sometimes people use format to try and make their writing look "quirky" (such as bolding certain words in a poem or spacing verses sporadically) and this doesn't always match the content. Good writing it was readers look for, not fancy formatting unless it enhances the writing.
Common rhymes Similar to spotting clichés, we look for more creative rhyming. What can be done when words ending "ing" are removed? Or how many times have we seen: Flight/Sight Life/Knife Long/Song etc ? Could the writer use something different and more effective? Does the rhyme necessarily have to be at the end of each line?
POV and Tense Does the writing skip around between the first person or third person? Does it Flick between past and future without clear deliberate reason why? Both of these elements contribute to the consistency of the story.
Concrete imagery Although a little bit of abstract imagery is okay, they sometimes too ambiguous for the reader to really be shown anything of value to the piece. Really powerful poetry not only uses concrete images; it also describes them vividly. Is the writer using concrete images?
Critique: A BreakdowndeviantArt is a website focusing on art. Wherever there is art, there is bound to be critique- no exceptions. While this fact may be aggravating and/or intimidating to younger, more inexperienced artists, they should learn and heed some basic advice on how to respond appropriately to receiving a critique.
This is a little bit of information about critiques- who critiques, what a critique encompasses, the different "styles" or approaches people take when offering critique, and appropriate ways to respond to all kinds of critiques.
What is Critique
Noun: A detailed analysis and assessment of something; a critical review or commentary, especially one dealing with works of art or literature.
Verb: Evaluate (a theory or practice) in a detailed and analytical way
In a nutshell, a critique (or to critique) is to approach something and analyze something in a critical manner. The key words here are analyze and criti
Want to test out your new found critique skills? Check out the Critiquable Art avalaible on deviantART!